I announced to the Facebook and Twitter world this morning that today I have lost 50 lbs in less than a year! Obviously this is a huge milestone for me. It probably took me around two to three years to gain it, so I knew it needed to come off slowly and methodically. Here are some answers to things that people ask (or want to ask) when they see how much weight I have lost:
(1) I have not dieted. I eat the same things I ate before I started trying to lose weight. I try to leave a bite when I am eating. I now make sure that the biggest meal of my day is at lunch. I do not eat after 6 p.m. except on Fridays and sometimes Saturdays. Those are the only changes I have made to my eating habits. The cutting out eating after 6 p.m. made the pounds melt off. Basically, I learned my metabolism.
(2) I have exercised - pretty hard too. Jillian Michael's 30 Day Shred is well worth the $9-15 (and some money for hand weights). It takes 30 minutes from start to finish, approximately 20 minutes is feeling like you are going to die workout, but since each exercise lasts a minute at the longest (two minutes if you count the repeat), it is completely doable. The 30 Day Shred jumpstarted my weight loss and it is now going to tone my arms so that I have bridesmaid's dress ready arms for my brother's wedding in May. Those pictures are going to last for years - no old lady arms for me! I also workout on the Gazelle when I am not doing the 30 Day Shred. I can now do three miles in about 36 minutes, which is basically running for 36 minutes with the pace. Easy on the knees, cheap equipment, privacy of my own home. I found workouts that work for me.
(3) I have to exercise 7 days a week. No breaks for me. That does not mean that I do not take a break periodically. I just figured out that I do better not taking a day off. I may workout less one day than the others. I even did not workout during my Mardi Gras trip, although I did walk a whole lot and stand a whole lot (standing burns more calories than sitting, right?) and carry a ton of beads. Maybe eventually my body will allow me to work out only three to four days a week, but I am not there yet.
(4) I have been very careful not to lose too much weight too fast. While doing the Shred video, I would allow myself to lose 5-7 lbs in a week early on. However, I prefer to average only 1-2 lbs, and I did not get upset in the weeks I had no weight loss, in part because I did not have weight gain either. I was sick in December and lost 5 lbs without doing anything other than being sick in a week, so I made sure and packed two of the pounds back on the next week before resuming my weight loss so that I was not losing weight too fast. Weight lost fast usually comes back faster, and I do not want it to come back!
(5) I drink lots of water. I realized I was wasting money at most fast food places by ordering drinks. Since I usually take my lunch back to the office anyway, I started getting my food without the drink and just drinking water. I think I gave up many empty calories by making that financial decision. I still enjoy a good sweet tea periodically, but I pretty much stick to water. Plus, if I drink enough water in the day, I am not as hungry as I am on days when I do not drink enough water. I know I sound like one of those fitness guru columnists on this one, but I have to be honest that I think it helps more than most people want to believe.
(6) 50 lbs is approximately three jean sizes, three or four dress sizes (depending on the maker), two belt sizes, and I do not know how many shirt sizes because I have not bought a shirt that fits in months. No wait - I bought one from Mardi Gras and it was two sizes smaller. I do not know about button up shirts though. The only things in my closet that fit right now are my t-shirts from college (and the new Saints Super Bowl t-shirt I just bought), my Levis I bought two weeks ago and my Mardi Gras shirt. Even my winter coat is too big. Even the suits I bought at the beginning of January are too big. When I can afford to buy clothes that fit, I am sure I will look even skinnier! In fact, the only thing annoying about weight loss is the clothing situation.
So there you go - there are the secrets to my weight loss and the clothing issue that no one is ever brave enough to ask, but everyone wants to know. All future weight loss is about toning and losing that last ten pounds that I can now physically see in my stomach region. The fact that I can physically see exactly where I need to lose the last few pounds is a pretty big deal to me!
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Snow and Social Media
There is no longer a need for a weatherman. I knew it would snow in Texarkana just from reading Facebook statuses. I knew how much by receiving statuses from my Facebook friends in Dallas and Quinlan. I knew it started in Texarkana not by seeing the first flake fall, but by reading a tweet. I knew it was sticking when someone started talking about their snowball fight on Twitter. Who needs a window in the office when I can depend on others to keep me informed about the weather?!
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
Friday, February 5, 2010
Turning in my girl card?
I have a confession to make. I hated Twilight. I do not get what makes the story so appealing to women. Or teenage girls for that matter.
First of all the movie tried to be too artsy. The use of color and lighting was over the top and added to the ridiculousness of the movie to me.
Second the heroine was dull. Really dull. There was no personality at all. She was emotionless. She did not have an interesting part at any point in the movie. Even worse, she was the narrator.
Third the "hero" and object of Bella's emotionless affection was way too effeminate. He was overly emotional. He expressed his feelings with words too much to be a realistic guy. I don't want a guy who talks about his feelings more than me ... or that has this overwhelming desire to kill me by sucking my blood. Plus I thought the actor is unattractive, and I find it disturbing that grown women are talking about how hot this guy who is forever 17 (and therefore forever a minor) is. My guess is that it is even worse for the new film since the actor that plays Jacob really was 17 when he played the part, and grown women are fantasizing over him too. Too weird for me! I don't get why women think that Edward is ideal.
I was afraid to watch the movie because I felt I would get sucked in like I did with Harry Potter. Fortunately this movie was not well written enough to entice me to read the books like Harry Potter was. Twilight ranks right there with The Notebook for me. I feel that both movies prove that women are too easily entertained. Plus both have too much teen porn - visually in The Notebook and emotionally (through Edward's unmasculine expressions of love) in Twilight. Since women almost universally choose those two movies as some of the best chick flicks of all time, I guess I need to turn in my woman card. However I still like a good Jane Austin book so maybe I can hold onto the woman card a little longer ... so long as I remember that Mr. Darcy doesn't exist!
I doubt that I could bring myself to watch New Moon. I wish I had the time back that I spent watching Twilight.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
First of all the movie tried to be too artsy. The use of color and lighting was over the top and added to the ridiculousness of the movie to me.
Second the heroine was dull. Really dull. There was no personality at all. She was emotionless. She did not have an interesting part at any point in the movie. Even worse, she was the narrator.
Third the "hero" and object of Bella's emotionless affection was way too effeminate. He was overly emotional. He expressed his feelings with words too much to be a realistic guy. I don't want a guy who talks about his feelings more than me ... or that has this overwhelming desire to kill me by sucking my blood. Plus I thought the actor is unattractive, and I find it disturbing that grown women are talking about how hot this guy who is forever 17 (and therefore forever a minor) is. My guess is that it is even worse for the new film since the actor that plays Jacob really was 17 when he played the part, and grown women are fantasizing over him too. Too weird for me! I don't get why women think that Edward is ideal.
I was afraid to watch the movie because I felt I would get sucked in like I did with Harry Potter. Fortunately this movie was not well written enough to entice me to read the books like Harry Potter was. Twilight ranks right there with The Notebook for me. I feel that both movies prove that women are too easily entertained. Plus both have too much teen porn - visually in The Notebook and emotionally (through Edward's unmasculine expressions of love) in Twilight. Since women almost universally choose those two movies as some of the best chick flicks of all time, I guess I need to turn in my woman card. However I still like a good Jane Austin book so maybe I can hold onto the woman card a little longer ... so long as I remember that Mr. Darcy doesn't exist!
I doubt that I could bring myself to watch New Moon. I wish I had the time back that I spent watching Twilight.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Haiti Tweets
I have been following some of the tweets coming out of Haiti, but I have to say that the ones that have affected me most are being posted by Mark Driscoll (@PastorMark). You can read his tweets even if you do not have Twitter. Driscoll is a sometimes controversial pastor who is known for stating some attention getting things in the pulpit. Maybe that is why his tweets are currently my favorite. No sugar coating. No exaggeration. No trying to find the right words for a news article. Just honest. It would be easy to shield the eyes and ears to all that is said and the pictures coming out. Yet, I believe that maybe we are to look and listen so that we can feel and sympathize and pray.
American Idol, you did it again
American Idol must have the smartest production staff ever. AI knows that there are only two reasons to watch the audition rounds - the personal stories and the really bad singers. Last week's episodes did not disappoint. The first one to grab the attention was the girl who has the Down's Syndrome brothers. She may not be the best singer (yet), but she is definitely one that I am rooting for. Of course some of American fell for a girl that completely annoyed me - the bumpkin that jumps bridges for fun and wears the Dollar Store dress. Seriously, she cannot sing, and they gave her unrealistic expectations that are going to be dashed and hurt her more than if they had been honest with her up front. She is terrible. If she makes the ten in the running when the real season starts, there is a serious lack of talent.
The producers know how to make us the audience talk about the really bad singers. They know that if the bad ones are not included, the audience is going to get bored. You had to have the freak out guy - there is one almost every season. The country bumpkin who could not sing a lick was represented (I would say twice, but one made it to Hollywood for some reason - see previous paragraph). Each year there has to be the one act that leaves everyone talking, at least since William Hung created the mold in Season Three. The producers found a classic one in General Larry Platt. If you read into Platt's background, there is no mistake as to why he was chosen to be this year's Internet sensation to have us talking about AI. He is a veteran, civil rights leader, and a local celebrity in Atlanta. They knew he would be appealing because of his ATL popularity. I suspect that they possibly even sought him out after hearing about him instead of him showing up on his own. Or maybe he showed up just to entertain the crowd. It was obvious that he would not qualify, and his tryout was only for show. Yet, knowing that we have been manipulated, the audience still cannot stop singing the song or talking about the guy. YouTube is now full of covers of the song. Late night hosts and football players are singing it. Facebook statuses (including one of my own) have been talking about him for a week.
Part of the reason that AI continues to be popular is because of the genius of the producers putting this material in front of us for our entertainment year in and year out. Part of the only reason I watch the early episodes is to see and laugh at the train wrecks. This year's overnight sensation quite possibly could be the best one of all. It was an original song instead of a cover, and now America is singing it. Brilliant. Instead of talking about how bad the general is, we are singing his song. By putting it in the first week, AI just created interest for the next few weeks of auditions. AI manipulates America, we know it, and yet it is still entertaining. Incredible.
The producers know how to make us the audience talk about the really bad singers. They know that if the bad ones are not included, the audience is going to get bored. You had to have the freak out guy - there is one almost every season. The country bumpkin who could not sing a lick was represented (I would say twice, but one made it to Hollywood for some reason - see previous paragraph). Each year there has to be the one act that leaves everyone talking, at least since William Hung created the mold in Season Three. The producers found a classic one in General Larry Platt. If you read into Platt's background, there is no mistake as to why he was chosen to be this year's Internet sensation to have us talking about AI. He is a veteran, civil rights leader, and a local celebrity in Atlanta. They knew he would be appealing because of his ATL popularity. I suspect that they possibly even sought him out after hearing about him instead of him showing up on his own. Or maybe he showed up just to entertain the crowd. It was obvious that he would not qualify, and his tryout was only for show. Yet, knowing that we have been manipulated, the audience still cannot stop singing the song or talking about the guy. YouTube is now full of covers of the song. Late night hosts and football players are singing it. Facebook statuses (including one of my own) have been talking about him for a week.
Part of the reason that AI continues to be popular is because of the genius of the producers putting this material in front of us for our entertainment year in and year out. Part of the only reason I watch the early episodes is to see and laugh at the train wrecks. This year's overnight sensation quite possibly could be the best one of all. It was an original song instead of a cover, and now America is singing it. Brilliant. Instead of talking about how bad the general is, we are singing his song. By putting it in the first week, AI just created interest for the next few weeks of auditions. AI manipulates America, we know it, and yet it is still entertaining. Incredible.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Background Change
I realized that my blog could not be read on an iPhone because of the previous background (and the need to have white letters), so I had to part with my favorite background to make it easier to read. I am sad that I had to go with a new look, but I think this one may grow on me.
Sacrificial Giving
I do not know what has made me so empathetic in this disaster. Maybe it is because it reminds me of Hurricane Katrina, just on a much larger scale. A city has been destroyed by a natural disaster and millions of lives are affected. Katrina was similar in that respect. Of course, add on the poverty in Haiti that was so much more desparate than in New Orleans, and it is truly catastrophic. New Orleans is just now getting back to what I would call "normal." I am afraid that Haiti will take even longer. I am also concerned that some organizations will create dependence instead of training the Haitian people in independence financially.
That having been said, if you have seen me promote giving to an organization, I have already given to it. I plan to give small amounts monthly to Compassion because I think it is an organization that promotes the gospel and financial independence for the children in its program. Even if you do not want to sponsor a child and want more freedom in choosing amounts to give each month (or once a year), there are options.
On another note, our former employee Darlynn is back on American soil and should be arriving in Texarkana by Wednesday. I know that her family must be relieved, but as someone who dealt with the emotions of Katrina even though I did not have to deal with the storm itself, this is when she and her family need more prayers than ever.
That having been said, if you have seen me promote giving to an organization, I have already given to it. I plan to give small amounts monthly to Compassion because I think it is an organization that promotes the gospel and financial independence for the children in its program. Even if you do not want to sponsor a child and want more freedom in choosing amounts to give each month (or once a year), there are options.
On another note, our former employee Darlynn is back on American soil and should be arriving in Texarkana by Wednesday. I know that her family must be relieved, but as someone who dealt with the emotions of Katrina even though I did not have to deal with the storm itself, this is when she and her family need more prayers than ever.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Compassion and Haiti
Yesterday I briefly mentioned Compassion, but today I wanted to provide more information for donating to the Haiti earthquake disaster relief. Compassion International is a wonderful child sponsorship organization and has the relationships necessary to hit the ground running in response to this disaster.
Here is an excerpt of an e-mail that Compassion sent out today:
WHY GIVE TO COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL:
FINANCIAL INTEGRITY: The FBI is warning of several Haiti charity scams that have popped up in the wake of this earthquake. http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/wayoflife/01/13/haiti.charity.scams/
They are suggesting that donations only be made to organizations monitored and rated by CharityNavigator.org and The American Institute of Philanthropy. Both organizations have given Compassion International their highest approval ranking. Compassion International is the only non-profit in it's category to receive eight consecutive years of four star rating from CharityNavigator.org.
Links regarding Compassion International's financial integrity:
http://www.compassion.com/about/financial/default.htm
http://www.compassion.com/press/currentnews/charity-navigator-awards-compassion-highest-rating-8th-year-in-row.htm
FIRST RESPONDER: In this disaster it is crucial that first responders receive support quickly. Because Compassion International ministers through local churches to meet the needs of that church's neighbors, and because these church partners are respected aid workers in their communities, Compassion is uniquely positioned to assess and meet the needs of it's sponsored children quickly. This is an advantage of our church-based model in practice for more than 50 years.
IN JESUS' NAME: Compassion International does not accept government funds which could at times restrict our ability to meet the physical and spiritual needs of children in Jesus' name. Because of this Compassion International's primary financial support comes from individual donors.
HOW DONATIONS WILL BE USED: All funds raised in response to the Haiti earthquake will be used immediately to provide for Compassion-assisted children and families affected by this crisis. Any funds raised in excess will be stewarded by Compassion for additional and future disaster relief efforts.
You can provide immediate relief today.
• $35 helps provide a relief pack filled with enough food and water to sustain a family for one week.
• $70 gift helps care for their needs for two weeks.
• $105 helps provide relief packs filled with enough food and water to sustain two families for two weeks.
• $210 gift helps care for two families' needs.
• $525 helps provide relief packs filled with enough food and water to sustain 10 families for two weeks.
• $1,050 gift helps care for 10 families' needs.
• $1,500 helps rebuild a home.
• $2,100 helps supply 20 families with the basics for three weeks.
Due to the high number of responses it may take longer than normal to process your transaction.
Here is an excerpt of an e-mail that Compassion sent out today:
WHY GIVE TO COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL:
FINANCIAL INTEGRITY: The FBI is warning of several Haiti charity scams that have popped up in the wake of this earthquake. http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/wayoflife/01/13/haiti.charity.scams/
They are suggesting that donations only be made to organizations monitored and rated by CharityNavigator.org and The American Institute of Philanthropy. Both organizations have given Compassion International their highest approval ranking. Compassion International is the only non-profit in it's category to receive eight consecutive years of four star rating from CharityNavigator.org.
Links regarding Compassion International's financial integrity:
http://www.compassion.com/about/financial/default.htm
http://www.compassion.com/press/currentnews/charity-navigator-awards-compassion-highest-rating-8th-year-in-row.htm
FIRST RESPONDER: In this disaster it is crucial that first responders receive support quickly. Because Compassion International ministers through local churches to meet the needs of that church's neighbors, and because these church partners are respected aid workers in their communities, Compassion is uniquely positioned to assess and meet the needs of it's sponsored children quickly. This is an advantage of our church-based model in practice for more than 50 years.
IN JESUS' NAME: Compassion International does not accept government funds which could at times restrict our ability to meet the physical and spiritual needs of children in Jesus' name. Because of this Compassion International's primary financial support comes from individual donors.
HOW DONATIONS WILL BE USED: All funds raised in response to the Haiti earthquake will be used immediately to provide for Compassion-assisted children and families affected by this crisis. Any funds raised in excess will be stewarded by Compassion for additional and future disaster relief efforts.
You can provide immediate relief today.
• $35 helps provide a relief pack filled with enough food and water to sustain a family for one week.
• $70 gift helps care for their needs for two weeks.
• $105 helps provide relief packs filled with enough food and water to sustain two families for two weeks.
• $210 gift helps care for two families' needs.
• $525 helps provide relief packs filled with enough food and water to sustain 10 families for two weeks.
• $1,050 gift helps care for 10 families' needs.
• $1,500 helps rebuild a home.
• $2,100 helps supply 20 families with the basics for three weeks.
Due to the high number of responses it may take longer than normal to process your transaction.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Haiti
If you are like me, you often want to help when you see a tragedy like the earthquake in Haiti, but you often do not know the best way to help. Since I believe that money should be sent to persons that already have relationships with the people on the ground and to places where I know it is going to be put to good use, I offer these two options for everyone to consider.
First, our office employed a legal assistant who is now a missionary to Haiti. Here is the e-mail that one of my colleagues sent out:
Also, Compassion International is a wonderful organization that I currently donate to for support of two children living in poverty. Compassion has ongoing ministries in Haiti, and is accepting donations designated specifically for disaster relief. Here is the link to donate.
First, our office employed a legal assistant who is now a missionary to Haiti. Here is the e-mail that one of my colleagues sent out:
Dear friends,
News reports from Haiti show that there has been tremendous damage and loss of life in Haiti.
As you may know one of our former legal assistants Darlynn Hon is a missionary in Haiti working at an orphanage.
Prior to the earthquake Darlynn indicated to me that the living conditions were poor and basic food and water needs were barely being met.
One can only imagine the conditions now and I anticipate that the conditions will be poor for a long time.
We have contacted Darlynn Hon's church "Church on the Rock" in Texarkana, Texas and they stated that they are accepting donations in the name of "Church on the Rock" with a memo of "Haiti missions." They indicated to us that they intend to send support as soon as they can. If you wish to make any contributions I'm sure they will be appreciated. You can contact Church on the Rock directly at 1601 Mall Drive, Texarkana, Texas 75503.
Also, Compassion International is a wonderful organization that I currently donate to for support of two children living in poverty. Compassion has ongoing ministries in Haiti, and is accepting donations designated specifically for disaster relief. Here is the link to donate.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Football Pet Peeve
I have watched my fair share of football to start 2010, and all the football has led me to decide my biggest pet peeve in football - the tackle celebration. It seems that all defensive linemen and backs must celebrate after every single tackle. Too often there is a celebration after a fifty yard run cut short by a touchdown saving tackle by the back who got beat fifty yards back. If you get beat, you cannot celebrate a tackle fifty yards down the field. The same is true if it was your teammate that got beat. Here are my rules for defensive celebrations:
1. Players are allowed to celebrate tackles that result in negative yardage.
2. Players are allowed to celebrate tackles when the other team went for it on fourth down and did not make it.
3. Tackles inside the five yard line on third and fourth down can be celebrated if there is no penalty and no score.
4. No offensive tackles can be celebrated because they come after turnovers unless your tackle results in the other team fumbling the ball and you getting it back.
5. The only special team tackles to be celebrated are the hard hitting tackles that result in the stands erupting into an immediate oooh.
Football players that follow these rules will earn my respect. Otherwise, I will continue to be unimpressed by most defensive players.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
1. Players are allowed to celebrate tackles that result in negative yardage.
2. Players are allowed to celebrate tackles when the other team went for it on fourth down and did not make it.
3. Tackles inside the five yard line on third and fourth down can be celebrated if there is no penalty and no score.
4. No offensive tackles can be celebrated because they come after turnovers unless your tackle results in the other team fumbling the ball and you getting it back.
5. The only special team tackles to be celebrated are the hard hitting tackles that result in the stands erupting into an immediate oooh.
Football players that follow these rules will earn my respect. Otherwise, I will continue to be unimpressed by most defensive players.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)